About Me

Name: TK Kenyon --...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Free Speech and NIH

For the last few years, the number of scientific papers freely accessible has been steadily rising because NIH has required (or at least actively solicited) grantees to allow free access to grant-supported papers one year after their initial publication.

This access is crucial for journalists and for citizen scientists who want to read the primary literature and judge results on their merit rather than relying on brief abstracts.

Most researchers have little access outside of their narrow field. For instance, a virologist might have subscriptions to major virology journals but might have a hard time gaining access to a paper in a cell or molecular biology journal, even though that paper might be quite similar to what s/he is working on.

The free access of information, especially information based on research funded by taxpayer money, is essential to research and to society. I hope Congress does not stymie the NIH's gallant attempt to spread knowledge.

Original article from Science Magazine: http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/911/1

Some members of Congress would like to overturn a controversial new policy that
requires scientists with grants from the U.S. National Institutes of Health
(NIH) to post their papers in a free online database. Today, an important House
committee grilled NIH about the policy and floated a proposal that scientific
publishers say is needed to protect their products.

Three years ago, NIH
began asking grantees to send the agency a copy of their accepted, peer-reviewed
papers so that it can make them freely accessible in its PubMed Central archive
within 12 months after they are published. But compliance was so poor that
proponents of the idea persuaded the House and Senate panels that set NIH's
budget to tell the agency to make the policy mandatory (ScienceNOW,
11 January).

NIH says compliance has risen to 56%, or about 3300 papers
submitted each month, since the rule took effect in April. (The agency could
potentially suspend the grant of an investigator who ignores the policy but is
so far relying on less punitive measures, such as reminders). Meanwhile, some
commercial and society publishers, such as the American Physiological Society
(APS), have complained that the policy infringes on their copyrights and will
put them out of business by cutting into their subscription base.

Now the
publishers have found allies on the powerful House Judiciary Committee, chaired
by Representative John Conyers (D–MI). At a 2-hour hearing of the Subcommittee
on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, Conyers and others
questioned the need for the policy when the public can already obtain the papers
through a subscription or at a library. Moreover, most journals make their
content free after 12 months.

NIH Director Elias Zerhouni defended the
policy. He argued that PubMed Central is enhancing the papers by linking to
molecular databases and other papers. "The real value is the connectivity,"
Zerhouni said. He also claimed that "there is no evidence that this has been
harmful" to publishers. In response, APS Executive Director Martin Frank, whose
society publishes 14 journals, disagrees, telling Science that some journal
editors believe the new policy is leading to "fewer eyeballs coming to their
sites."

A bill introduced today by Conyers and two other members would bar
any federal agency from requiring "the transfer or license" to the government of
a paper that has been produced in part with nongovernment funds--a reference to
the publisher's costs for peer review and production. The Fair Copyright in
Research Works Act (HR 6845) would mean that neither NIH nor any other federal
agency could require grantees to submit accepted papers to a free archive.

There is no companion bill in the Senate, and Congress is not expected to
act on the legislation before it adjourns later this month. Jonathan Band, a
Washington, D.C., attorney who represents the American Library Association,
which favors open access, says the bill's sweeping provisions are a fatal flaw.
"It goes far beyond the NIH policy. It limits a lot of what the federal
government can do," he says. But the keen interest the House Judiciary Committee
showed today in the topic suggests that the debate is not over.

TK Kenyon, http://www.tkkenyon.com/
Author of RABID and CALLOUS: Two novels about science, faith, and humanity, with some sex and murder.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Contest: Mock the Reviewers!

Have you read some of those bitter book reviews that Publisher's Weekly, Kirkus Reviews, etc., publish? Some of them seem like the reviewer didn't read the novel or else they completely missed the point.

Here's your chance to review a review. Write a review (under 1000 words) in the style of a literary review, but make it a review of a review, and post it in the comments of the blog below. Sign your name or make up your own mocking pseudonym.

Enter at:  http://tkkenyon.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-review-review-contest.html  

Here's an example:

"In this snarky review of *Great American Novel* by Random A. Kunati, the anonymous reviewer makes both factual and grammatical errors.The review appears to be written based on a misreading of the jacket material and myopic observance of the cover art, leading the reviewer to the impression that *GAN* is a memoir about growing up a gay Goth in Texas. *GAN* is, in fact, a satiric fantasy about vampire unicorns in Iraq. While minimal scanning of the novel would have rectified this egregious error, the reviewer appears unable to see beyond their own hairy butt. More illiterate than illustrative."

Best Review Review wins bragging rights, and I'll publish it in the blog!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Contest: Mock the Reviewers!

Have you read some of those bitter book reviews that Publisher's Weekly, Kirkus Reviews, etc., publish? Some of them seem like the reviewer didn't read the novel or else they completely missed the point.

Here's your chance to review a review. Write a review (under 1000 words) in the style of a literary review, but make it a review of a review, and post it in the comments of the blog below. Sign your name or make up your own mocking pseudonym.

Enter at:  http://tkkenyon.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-review-review-contest.html  

Here's an example:

"In this snarky review of *Great American Novel* by Random A. Kunati, the anonymous reviewer makes both factual and grammatical errors.The review appears to be written based on a misreading of the jacket material and myopic observance of the cover art, leading the reviewer to the impression that *GAN* is a memoir about growing up a gay Goth in Texas. *GAN* is, in fact, a satiric fantasy about vampire unicorns in Iraq. While minimal scanning of the novel would have rectified this egregious error, the reviewer appears unable to see beyond their own hairy butt. More illiterate than illustrative."

Best Review Review wins bragging rights, and I'll publish it in the blog!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Contest: Mock the Reviewers!

Have you read some of those bitter book reviews that Publisher's Weekly, Kirkus Reviews, etc., publish? Some of them seem like the reviewer didn't read the novel or else they completely missed the point.

Here's your chance to review a review. Write a review (under 1000 words) in the style of a literary review, but make it a review of a review, and post it in the comments of the blog below. Sign your name or make up your own mocking pseudonym.

Enter at:  http://tkkenyon.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-review-review-contest.html  

Here's an example:

"In this snarky review of *Great American Novel* by Random A. Kunati, the anonymous reviewer makes both factual and grammatical errors.The review appears to be written based on a misreading of the jacket material and myopic observance of the cover art, leading the reviewer to the impression that *GAN* is a memoir about growing up a gay Goth in Texas. *GAN* is, in fact, a satiric fantasy about vampire unicorns in Iraq. While minimal scanning of the novel would have rectified this egregious error, the reviewer appears unable to see beyond their own hairy butt. More illiterate than illustrative."

Best Review Review wins bragging rights, and I'll publish it in the blog!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kunati Book Publishers, Publisher of Controversial Books, Wins Major Industry Award

Kunati, the controversial indie book publisher that published my two novels, RABID and CALLOUS, has won one of the most prestigious awards for indie publishers.

Kunati Book Publishers  was named as the winner of the the INDEPENDENT PUBLISHER OF THE YEAR AWARD at BookExpo by FOREWORD MAGAZINE, one of the five dominant trade magazines in the book publishing field.

The new honor was created to celebrate ForeWord's tenth anniversary and to recognize Kunati's "innovation and fearlessness."  

Kunati, a year-old publisher, leads the industry in innovative marketing techniques for their books. Kunati produces book trailers for every new release, maintains a blog, and encourages its authors to actively participate in marketing their books. The publisher currently has several movie deals in the works for its novels, and its roster of authors includes Pulitzer Prize winner John E. Mack, Joshua Corin, and Derek Armstrong.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Amazon Oopsie!

Amazon jumped the gun and is offering my new novel, CALLOUS, for sale ahead of its May publication date ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1601640226 ) . When RABID was released last year, Amazon sold out and even sucked dry its wholesaler, so they had to backorder the book from the distributer and it took a couple weeks to get the fresh meat.

If you want to read CALLOUS any time soon, muscle your way to the head of the line and snatch a copy from some milquetoast's virtual shopping cart now!

TK Kenyon
http://www.tkkenyon.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Your Cardinal One of the Five Worst for Helping Child Sex Abusers?


A press release by SNAP (Survivors' Network of those Abused by Priests) today listed the following five cardinals as the most complicit in concealing child sex abuse by the religious. In this, they are accessories after the fact because they concealed a crime rather than reported it to authorities.

Five Worst Catholic Cardinals
  1. Cardinal Francis George of Chicago
  2. Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles
  3. Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Houston
  4. Cardinal Sean O'Malley of Boston
  5. Cardinal Edward Egan of New York
Cardinal Francis George of Chicago
-- In August 2005, Fr. Daniel McCormack was questioned by the police because of abuse allegations. Two months later, the Chicago lay review board recommended that George suspend McCormack. George refused, kept silent and let his chancellor promote McCormack. Three months later, police arrested McCormack again. During those last few months of his active parish ministry in Chicago's inner city, McCormack molested at least three boys, the district attorney said. (One of the children, prosecutors say, had been assaulted "on an almost daily" basis.)

http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001A3QMX8BTwdGjiHTEkr0mGB0f-_vl4G4bh78-PbGgVFqJ64rES7bPcPpe3uqBkIbBU8fb7wOqXy3R5atbYmfkRjUe-p5qA8eLiww6yYW8Ve1cUJIeA7kHE9fYXPnhcstmlOolmEMgwoiMhEC6m0fPBqffDPu0oRhgWpLtDj8O-LhoR0W1b-As_KJlspQ37XdTMl0i3p4bR7c=

McCormack has pled guilty to child molestation.

Later, records obtained by victims' attorneys showed that in 1999, a school principal reported accusations against McCormack to archdiocesan officials. Nothing was done.

Adding insult to injury, five high ranking church officials closely involved in this fiasco have since been promoted. http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2008/01_02/2008_01_24_Hogan_TheCardinal.htm

The female veteran school principal (who was the only archdiocesan staffer to call the police) has, however, been fired. Church authorities refuse to say why. http://reform-network.net/?p=606

-- While the McCormack case has received some attention, George has displayed shocking callousness, recklessness and secrecy in other, post-2002 cases. Perhaps most notably, within months of the adoption of the so-called 'reforms' in Dallas,
George knowingly and secretly let a convicted predator priest (Fr. Kenneth
Martin) work in the archdiocese and live, part-time, with George in George's
mansion. http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news5/2003_03_02_Falsani_PriestsCase.htm

Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles
In 2005 or 2006, LA church and school officials were questioned by police about current child sex abuse allegations against John Malburg. Malburg was a Catholic high school principal from a politically prominent family. The archdiocese didn't suspend him. They told no one about the investigation. Six months later, Malburg was arrested and criminally charged. Parents asked church officials "Why didn't you tell us? Why didn't you suspend him?" Cardinal Mahony's PR man told the LA Times "Law enforcement told us to keep quiet." The next day, in the LA Times, prosecutors said they never made any such request. http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2006/11_12/2006_11_19_NBC4_ArchdioceseChurch.htm , http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news5/2006_11_17_Hong_CorruptionTarget.htm

In just nine months, police say, Fr. Nicholas Aguilar Rivera, sexually assaulted at least 26 boys in Los Angeles.

In August 2007, long-secret church records about Aguilar were publicly disclosed. According to the New York Times, the documents showed that then-Msgr. Thomas Curry "tipped off" the accused pedophile priest who then fled to Mexico to avoid criminal prosecution.(An LA district attorney said Curry "facilitated" Aguilar's flight.) Aguilar went on to molest kids in Mexico later. http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2006/09_10/2006_10_21_McKinley_AccusedPriests.htm

Curry is now one of Mahony's auxiliary bishops. Despite public pleas to discipline Curry, or at least speak out about Curry's irresponsible secrecy, Mahony said and did nothing.

· For years, Mahony stayed secretly let an admitted child-molesting cleric live in his archdiocese (in a picturesque religious complex overlooking the ocean), despite the cleric's being wanted on criminal charges in Canada. In 2005, when SNAP and others demanded that Mahony and his colleagues turn Franciscan friar Gerald Chumik to law enforcement, he let Chumik move from Santa Barbara Mission Church in Santa Barbara to Missouri.

For 14 years, Chumik has been a fugitive from his native Canada.

SNAP leaders believe this needlessly put children at risk and is a clear violation of the much-touted Dallas Charter which all American bishops adopted in June of 2002.

Elected district attorneys rarely feud in public with powerful religious figures. But in October 2005, (more than three years after Mahony pledged "openness" about child sex abuse and cover ups), Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley said "Three years ago, I urged Cardinal Mahony to provide the fullest possible disclosure of evidence of sexual abuse by clergy. Despite two court rulings ordering full disclosure, Cardinal Mahony continues to claim 'confidentiality privileges' that no court has recognized." http://da.co.la.ca.us/mr/archive/2005/101205a.htm?zoom_highlight=clergy
Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Houston
In November 2007, a victim reported having been sexually abused by Fr. Stephen Horn between 1989 and 1993. DiNardo found him credible and suspended Horn. The Cardinal, however, kept the allegation and his determination secret from parishioners, police and the public for two months, despite US bishops' repeated pledges to act quickly and openly with credibly sex abuse allegations. Finally, in mid-January, DiNardo disclosed his action. (The delay gave Horn, a credibly accused molester, ample opportunity to fabricate alibis, destroy evidence, intimidate victims, threaten witnesses, or even flee the country, as some pedophile priests have done.)

Part of DiNardo's secrecy and delay occurred in the weeks between when the Pope announced that DiNardo would be named a Cardinal (October 2007) and when DiNardo was promoted amid much pageantry (November 24). Some Houston Catholics have speculated that DiNardo didn't want the news of Horn's crimes to 'rain on (DiNardo's) parade.'

Weeks ago, SNAP wrote DiNardo, urging him to explain and apologize for his secrecy. SNAP has urged the cardinal to visit parishes where Horn worked and emphatically beg victims and witnesses to come forward, get help and call the police. He has not responded to either the letter or the request.

When he was a bishop in Sioux City Iowa, DiNardo similarly mishandled the Fr. George McFadden case in Iowa, only disclosing the allegations against this predator priest long afterwards.)

Beginning in the 1990s (and likely longer), Sioux City church officials knew of repeated charges of child molestation against McFadden, an admitted abuser, dating back into the 1960s. (DiNardo was Sioux City bishop starting in 1997.) For at least five years (and even later), DiNardo had the chance to disclose McFadden's hurtful actions to police, prosecutors, parishioners, and the public, and to keep McFadden from other vulnerable children. He stayed silent.

According to the Des Moines Register, "The confessed child molester continued to hear confession and say Mass daily over the past decade at the Cathedral of the Epiphany, Sioux City's largest Catholic church.) http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/2002_06_23_Rood_ChurchSecrecy.htm

McFadden is accused of abusing more than 25 girls and boys in dozens of civil lawsuits. Despite his alleged 'treatment' and 'retirement' in the 1990s, he continued to function as priest until 2002. http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news5/2008_01_14_Kever_PriestRemoved.htm , http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2008/01_02/2008_01_14_Quinn_ChurchOfficials.htm
Cardinal Sean O'Malley of Boston

Last month church officials disclosed that, for the second year in a row, O'Malley is in violation of the US bishops' child sex abuse prevention policy. Much in the policy is meaningless public relations, SNAP is convinced. But O'Malley's breaking one of the proven, practical requirements that help prevent abuse: training kids how to avoid or stop being victimized.

Roughly one in five Boston Catholic children is not receiving this training. Every child is supposed to receive it. Worse, O'Malley tries to dodge responsibility for this clear, egregious refusal by blaming pastors and parishioners.

But O'Malley's had six years to persuade colleagues to weaken the national abuse policy, devise alternative programs, or get on board (and get his employees on board). He's done none of these three steps.

Nor has he disciplined a single individual for flaunting this national requirement. http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2008/03_04/2008_04_11_Hamm_AbuseVictims.htm
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2006/03_04/2006_03_10_Levenson_88Victims.htm

In a 2006 case with disturbing parallels to many of the hundreds of Boston pedophile priest cases, O'Malley moved very slowly and gingerly against a prominent Catholic hospital official who faces multiple allegations of sexually harassing employees.

A high ranking human resources official at the hospital "accused O'Malley of improperly interceding in the investigation to help (the accused), giving him advance notice of the probe, providing him with an adviser, and telling of the reprimand before consulting with the board," according to the Boston Globe.

The cardinal's actions ''have made a mockery of the investigation. It is nothing short of shameful," she wrote. "Perhaps most troubling" was what she called the ''near absence" of concern for the women complainants that she said was shown by the church hierarchy. http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/05/21/omalley_reprimands_caritas_chief/

Cardinal Edward Egan of New York

Less than two months ago, the New York Post reported "The former principal of a prestigious Catholic high school who resigned amid allegations of inappropriate images on his work computer was allowed to stay on the job for nearly five months after a priest wrote the New York Archdiocese accusing him of serious misconduct."
http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001A3QMX8BTwdFVL7g9LLBPS4JofD4Xq5raTNEHc52QfsmiOshfaKEz246QHKV4fvYVHW-aPyPA7v6N4BqnGa5cI19mG86myJLXKfsHy3Pd5veAdIz0nqvKKYgIjMnB33KXzWFju2va8kRyaLXrDLZ-jLUOMSOQz3GjyhhuP0FGiXu67igUxsemJlfHhIsYFQntQYAEQybe1CxfFtToHTJ3_A==
http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001A3QMX8BTwdHWBrREREHWiSGBtEhR8DGkdJhidP4oN4zcvovoOi4NQrs1-uc6VWcMtqR6N5c39kJHUw9YQOQeyQ7sONg2jqkL_um3aIKrP7pG9_quTYw5SFdiBcDJpFu3Hav7OuOU766JLWIW1iHZ5SYU32WyKAWGVDxli8qIh1Q=

In 2003, Egan became the first US prelate to refuse to say mass for the devoutly Catholic, hand-picked, distinguished lay panel chosen by bishops to look at the church's child sex abuse crisis. According to the New York Times, Egan also "interfered with" and prevented the US bishops' 'watchdog' on clergy sex cases from speaking in his archdiocese.

(SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, is the nation's oldest and largest support group for clergy abuse victims. We've been around for 17 years and have more than 8,000 members across the country. Despite the word "priest" in our title, we have members who were molested by religious figures of all denominations, including nuns, rabbis, bishops, and Protestant ministers. Our website is SNAPnetwork.org)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Religion of Global Warming

Morning Edition on NPR recently produced a puff piece about Kristen Bynes, blogger of Ponder the Maunder, a blog dedicated to refuting the idea that global warming is a man-made phenomenon.

While the issue of a 16 yo kid becoming a leading global warming contrarian is devastating for the contrary view's validity as a scientific theory, and it seems that she indeed attended a short course at UGoog in Climate Science to arrive at her pre-ordained conclusions (which is the complete antithesis of how science should be conducted,) and that NPR is succumbing to natural selection by lowest common denominator, it seems that there is more to this story.

Personally, I’m not sold on the whole idea of global warming, man-made or not. I used to be. I was upset by the enormous amounts of CO2 that we humans were venting into the atmosphere, just like we exhaust raw sewage into our oceans, etc., etc., etc. And, you know, it seemed warmer, discounting that horrendous Iowa winter of 1995 when temps hit -40F and the Iowa River froze over. You can eliminate outliers in your data, as long as you can account for them, or at least make a nice statistical argument for ignoring them. It seemed that the consensus of the scientific community is that man-made global warming is a threat, and I generally go along with scientific consensus unless there’s a valid reason to doubt, and it had better be a good one. I don’t like the contrarian position.

I do, however, like data. Hard data. Preferably raw, pre-crunched data.

Here’s what changed my mind on global warming: I read that horrible anti-GW novel by Michael Crichton, which so sticks in my mind that I can’t recall the title, and I thought that his novel was so badly written that surely its conclusions can be tossed aside with great force. Crichton is both a horrid novelist and merely an MD.

(Yes, I am arrogant to snark so widely. I hold a fiction MFA from Iowa, where I received many prizes, and have published two well-received novels. During my PhD work in microbiology, I taught medical students in a Midwestern medical school. They’re great at memorizing things but, let’s face it, medical school does not reward original thought nor critical thinking. Their exams are multiple-guess. So, I’m snarky and arrogant. Crichton has loads more money than I have and a huge house on Kauai. He can take the shot.)

So, I set out on my own course of study at UGoog. I expected to quickly dismiss Crichton’s objections with data and confirm the majority opinion. It seems like an overwhelming opinion. I figured it would take an hour.

Here’s what I found: the global warming data is terrible. The methods that collected the data that produced the scary graph that we’ve all seen (where temperature spikes up in the 1970’s) are beyond shaky. It’s really bad science. I read the whole UN report, and the data that is cited in the prologue, which everyone reads, is a minor part of the whole report. Only surface temps, and only those in major urban areas, are going up. Atmospheric temperatures are not. This is to be expected by the “heat island” effect, where asphalt retains more heat than soil and re-radiates this heat at night.

Personally, I’m on the fence. The data behind GW, whether man-made or not, sucks. Here’s the problem: whenever you say that the data sucks, people jump on you like you insulted Jesus. They label you a “denialist” and, rather than debate the data, accuse you of wanting to rape the planet.

The global warming debate has moved from the arena of science, where one is free to debate data, methods, and conclusions, and into the area of religion, where one must adhere to dogma or else risk retribution.

That’s a huge problem.

When I published a short blog post about this (http://science4non-majors.blogspot.com/2007/11/hoax-of-global-warming-john-coleman.html ), I got hate mail. Not refute mail. Not argue mail. Hate mail.

Even though my blog post encouraged recycling and conservation, people accused me of trying to destroy the planet.

The debate about global warming must return to being a debate, not a tirade, not a crusade, and not a sermon.

TK Kenyon
http://www.tkkenyon.com/
http://science4non-majors.blogspot.com/

Author of RABID ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1601640021 ) and CALLOUS ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1601640226 ): Two novels about science and religion, with some sex and murder.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New Mexico: Iraqi Money and Bomb Found in Stolen Car. FBI Says It's Not Terrorism.


After finding explosives and about 1000 USD worth of Iraqi money in a stolen car in New Mexico, the FBI has ruled out terrorism.
 
WHAT?
 
Yep, according to KOB.com, a news station in New Mexico, the police found a stolen car, about $1000 worth of Iraqi money, and an explosive device in a car in Los Lunas, which is southwest of Albuquerque. Los Lunas Police Captain Charles Nuanes said, “We don’t know what their intentions were. We don’t know what they were planning on doing with any of this.” 
 
Maybe they were planning to blow something up?
 
While no one knows exactly what the plan was, we can safely say this: someone with Middle Eastern connections good enough to be paid in Iraqi money wanted to blow something up.
 
Some might decry that Middle Eastern does not necessarily equal Islamic, but let's face it. The Jihadists are the ones who have declared jihad. Jihad means war. Saying that jihad means "struggle" is like saying that "conflict" doesn't really mean "war," as in "The Vietnam Conflict."
 
The US is threatened by Islamists infiltrating the Western border. See this story on the planned terrorist attack on Fort Huachuca in southern Arizona.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saudi Arabia to Execute Woman for Witchcraft

Fawza Falih, convicted witch, has been sentenced to execution for the crime of witchcraft in Saudi Arabia. No, this isn’t a callous novel about superstitious hysteria and the unearned tyranny of religious leaders. It’s true. It’s horribly true. Fawza Falih’s head is going to be chopped off with a long sword because she confessed to witchcraft.

The Wages of Witchcraft and a Confession

The court in Quraiyat, on April 2, 2006, sentenced Fawza Falih to death by beheading for the alleged crimes of “witchcraft, recourse to jinn [supernatural beings], and slaughter” of animals. Court Verdict number 125/2 (October 10, 2006) states that Ms. Fawza Falih confessed “I take 1,500 Riyal,” about $400 USD, “for each act, of which I send half to the magician Abu Tal’a [who allegedly taught her “witchcraft”] according to the agreement, for Abu Tal’a said to me, ‘If you do not bring the money, by God, you will become possessed by jinn like dogs.’”

She was convicted on the testimony of several witnesses, none of whom she or her representatives were allowed to cross-examine. One man accused her of causing his impotence. Another man said that she accurately predicted the month that his divorced, ex-wife would return to him.

Imprisonment at the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice

After her arrest on May 4, 2005, Fawza Falih was imprisoned for 35 days at the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice (CPVPV.) The CPVPV is forbidden by royal decree to hold prisoners at their center, though they do, nevertheless. Her jailors, including one official of the governorate, beat her during her interrogation. Her appeal states that she was beaten unconscious during one interrogation and was treated at the hospital. Fellow female prisoners bandaged her wounds. A relative who was allowed to visit her, after she had been held by the CPVPV for about 20 days and following her hospitalization, saw marks from beatings on her back.

Ms. Filah has since recanted her confession of witchcraft, saying that she was beaten until she confessed and thumbprint-signed a confession, which she could not read because she is illiterate.

“To Preserve the Creed and Souls and Property”

According to Islamic law, Fawza Filah should not be sentenced to death for witchcraft because she recanted her confession, thereby throwing some doubt on her commission of “crimes against God.” However, the judges in Quraiyat, in a new verdict of June 6, 2007, sentenced Fawza Falih to death on a “discretionary” basis, because it was in the “public interest” and to “preserve the creed and the souls and property of this country.”

Human Rights Watch has sent a letter to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, asking for clemency or pardon.

It is astonishing that people are so superstitious that they believe in witchcraft, would condemn a woman to death for it, and are able to do so by the power of a theocratic state. Religion in general fosters this hysterical, irrational attitude, and the fanatical religious indoctrination rampant in Saudi Arabia that passes for education at all levels is the cause.

TK Kenyon

www.tkkenyon.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal Radio Talk Show Host Bernie Ward Indicted on Child Porn Charges: What "Research" Means

 Radio talk show host Bernie Ward was indicted on federal child pornography charges on December 6, 2007 on one count of receiving child pornography and two counts of distributing it. Ward is a liberal talk show host who also hosts “GodTalk” because he is a former Catholic (Franciscan) priest.  
 .
“Bernie was doing research for a book he was doing on hypocrisy in America,” Doron Weinberg, who appeared in federal court today as Ward's lawyer, said.  
 .
Research? That’s the oldest excuse in the book. And the dumbest. And the least likely to be true.  
 .
Here’s what pedophiles mean when they say they were doing “research:”  
 .
“I was researching how many 10MB images of raped children would fit on a 160GB hard drive.”
 .
“I was researching just how hard seeing a child raped gets me.”  
 .
“I was researching how to rape a child.”  
 .
“I was researching the Justice Department’s reaction times.”  
 .
“I was researching what level of Hell pedophiles go to when they die.”  
 .
“I was doing preliminary research for my ultimate research goal: what happens to pedophiles in prison when their cellmate, Big Jimbo, finds out they like to rape children.”  
 .
It’s never, ever research. If someone has child pornography on their computer, they’re a pedophile.  
 .
“[RABID] is a novel quite unlike most standard commercial fare, a genre-bending story--part thriller, part literary slapdown with dialogue as the weapon of choice (think Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf)-- that makes us laugh, wince, and reflect all at the same time. Kenyon is definitely a keeper.” –Booklist Starred Review
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TK Kenyon, Sexism, and Getting Slammed by The Liberal Lefties

Under the category of “No Good Deed Goes Unpunished,” I was attacked by a liberal leftie blog for defending Doris Lessing’s recent (2007) Nobel Prize for Literature against people who denigrated her work.
 
I don’t want to publicize this blog, but you can search for “T.K. Kenyon + sexism” on Google and find it.
 
The person who wrote the blog emailed me ... twice ... through an email widgit to ensure that I knew about this particular Google search, linking my name to “sexism.” That’s a singularly cruel thing to do. Think about how you would feel if a Google search of your name + “racism” turned up a blog accusing you of that, let alone that the author made sure you knew what she was calling you behind your back.
 
I was attacked as a “sexist,” because I noted that Doris Lessing wrote seminal feminist works, and her critics, mostly men, thought that she, a feminist writer, didn’t deserve the Nobel Prize.
 
That’s right, I stood up for a person being slammed by sexists, and that makes me a sexist. The woman writing the blog obviously thinks that sexism no longer exists, but it does.
 
Anecdotes about sexism abound. I have several. One creative writing professor that I studied with critiqued women’s stories with female characters thusly: if the character was weak, they were “weepy;” if the character was strong and yelled or did anything proactive, they were “strident.”
 
Men in this class did not cross-write female characters, it must be noted.
 
“Strident” is a term often used to defame Doris Lessing’s protagonists. The term is also used to bash women who are perceived as too strong. In Carolyn G. Heilbrun’s Writing A Woman’s Life, she said that when women tell the truth, we are called strident.
 
I am more trained as a scientist than as a writer, at least in number of years in graduate school, so I tend to use statistics more than anecdotes to support opinions.
 
Male and female authors publish books in roughly equal numbers. However:
 
Percentage of book reviews for male authors vs. female authors for 2006 in major review publications: 56%:44%
 
Percentage of book reviews for male authors vs. female authors for Jan-June 2007 in major review publications: 63%:37%
 
Percentage of book reviews for male authors vs. female authors for at the New York Times Review of Books (very influential): 72%:28%
 
Ratio of male book reviewers to female reviewers at the New York Times Review of Books: 2:1
 
Percentage of articles written by men to those written by women in the five “thought leader” magazines: 3:1
 
Worse yet, as I read most of those magazines, I can tell you with a quick glace at my stock, that the few women writers write about women, home life, babies, diapers, poems, and very light culture. The heavy stuff like economics is reserved for the boys.
 
 
Women constitute only 17 percent of opinion writers at The New York Times, 10 percent at The Washington Post, 28 percent at U.S. News & World Report, 23 percent at Newsweek and 13 percent at Time. Overall, only 24 percent of nationally syndicated columnists are women.
 
No matter what the flailing Uncle Tom-asina thinks about sexism, it’s alive and well in the publishing and book critiquing businesses. Doris Lessing got bashed. I got bashed for defending her from the sexists who denigrated her work because it was too “strident.”

I’m not surprised.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jeff Huber Talks Rings Around Talk Radio Host

Jeff Huber, novelist and pundit, will talk tonight on a WTPRN radio show called American Forum with host Karen Kwiatkowski, the retired U.S. Air Force colonel who blew the whistle on Dick Cheney's Office of Special Plans that cooked the intelligence on Iraq, to talk about his new novel BATHTUB ADMIRALS."

You can find the phone numbers here on Townhall.com!

TK Kenyon
Author of the novels RABID and CALLOUS
"An author to watch!"--Booklist Starred Review
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Huckabee Talks Turkey about Saudi Oil

On CNN's "Late Edition," Republican Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee said, "The United States has been far too involved in sort of looking the other way, not only at the atrocities of human rights and violation of women."

 

He further said, "Every time we put our credit card in the gas pump, we're paying so that the Saudis get rich — filthy, obscenely rich, and that money then ends up going to funding madrassas," Islamic schools, "that train the terrorists. America has allowed itself to become enslaved to Saudi oil. It's absurd. It's embarrassing."

 

Huckabee said, "I would make the United States energy independent within 10 years and tell the Saudis they can keep their oil just like they can keep their sand, that we won't need either one of them."

 

Huckabee should know. He's the former chairman of the Interstate Oil & Gas Compact Commission, a 37-state coalition to develop energy policy and lobby Congress on energy matters, such as the regulation of oil and gas production. He actually understands what he's talking about, while other folks spout untenable ideas.

 

While the U.S. does import more oil from Canada than it does from Saudi Arabia (seriously, we do,) the Canadians aren't funding terrorists. Saudi oil and our purchase of it fuels terrorism.

 

I'm not sure who I'm voting for in the primary, but I'll be keeping a closer eye on Huckabee. He's making sense, which is rare for a politician.

 

TK Kenyon, author of RABID: A Novel and CALLOUS: A Novel
"Kenyon is an author to watch." --Booklist Starred Review

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Now the "Sanctity of Lifers" Can Shut Up

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: The End of the Ethical Debate

 Two truly momentous papers have been published in Science and Cell. These papers were so important that even Yahoo News recognized their importance, and news services prefer stories about giant bugs
 
These “induced pluripotent stem cells” (or iPS, as opposed to embryonic stem cells, or ES) produced by these two labs are important for a variety of reasons.
 
First, these cells completely end the whole debate about whether or not obtaining stem cells from the destruction of a human embryo is ethical. That’s it. It’s over. Don’t want to hear any more about it.
 
Assuming these cells are truly pluripotent, and there is every indication they are, and if none of the caveats below are a problem, then this is it. In the papers above, researchers used several different types of human cells, ones from an adult woman’s face (a 36-year-old Caucasian woman, in Takahashi, et al,) and foreskin fibroblasts (Yu, et al,), which are cells harvested during the circumcision of newborn boys.
 
(You didn’t think we just threw those cells away, did you? They’re essentially fetal cells, a veritable cell culture gold mine. They’re used for many kinds of research, especially growing viruses in culture. Plus, if you grow enough of them and sew them into a wallet, and then rub the wallet, it turns into a suitcase. Sorry, old joke.)
 
Second, there was an additional ethical problem with ES cells, though it was considered secondary to the destruction of human life issue. To obtain human ova to perform nuclear transfer and thus produce ES cells, a woman had to undergo hormone therapy and surgery. Granted, the procedures are pretty much the same as in IVF, but ovulation-inducing fertility drugs have been linked with later ovarian cancer.
 
Another concern is that human ova would become very valuable as a cure for everything from spinal cord injuries to Parkinson’s to Alzheimer’s to genetic diseases, etc. Should you pay women for this valuable resource and to chance getting ovarian cancer later in life?
 
Again, these debates are now ended. These iPS cells don’t need eggs.
 
Third, using cells from an adult woman’s face to produce iPS cells is truly a breakthrough. This provides the proof-of-concept that an adult’s cells can be reprogrammed to pluripotency. If only fetal cells or newborn cells were possible to reprogram, this technique would be useful to correct birth defects or inborn genetic diseases but could not help diseases like Parkinson’s or cure spinal cord injuries.
 
Fourth, this lentivirus technique is easy. Really easy. Many, many labs use the lentivirus vectors and selection techniques described in these papers to produce stably transfected cell lines. I’ve done it. When this technique is refined and, hopefully, declared safe, labs all over the country could begin using this protocol for patients.
 
Nuclear transfer (the “Dolly” technique) that uses ES cells, on the other hand, is much more difficult.
 
There are, as always, some caveats. This technique will probably produce stem cells suitable for many kinds of research. It’s going to be a huge boon to labs.
 
It may not safely work for people. The four genes used are transcription factors, and their upregulation (which means when more is produced) is associated with cancer cells. Cells produced using this technique may cause cancer instead of cures. Takahashi, et al, used Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc. (As a virologist, seeing Myc in there gives me the proverbial willies, even if it is the c-Myc gene and not v-Myc.) Yu, et al, used Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, and Lin28, though Lin28 may not be necessary.
 
“Lentiviruses” are retroviruses. The retroviruses used to insert the four genes into the cells may damage the cells’ DNA when they integrate into the chromosomes and thus cause cancer.
 
Yet, the possibility of a cure may outweigh the possibility of future cancer. Women choose the increased risk of future cancer to have children by ovulation induction, and they do it often.
 
Think of it this way: if you had a profoundly dehabilitating disease, such as Parkinson’s, or early-onset Alzheimer’s, or a spinal cord injury, you might be given the choice between a cure (or a profound reduction in symptoms,) but the risk might be a 10% chance of cancer in the next decade.
 
Wouldn’t you want the choice?
 
TK Kenyon, author of RABID: A Novel and CALLOUS: A Novel (Apr 2008)
 
RABID is “[A] philosophical battle between science and religion ... with four very subtle and intriguing central characters. This is a novel quite unlike most standard commercial fare, a genre-bending story--part thriller, part literary slapdown with dialogue as the weapon of choice.” –Booklist Starred Review
 
Read “Why Dante Became A Priest: Communion Is A Kiss,” the prequel to RABID! You can even read it on your Amazon Kindle! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »